Visual Metafunctions of Drone Videography in the Presidential Secretariat’s YouTube Public Communication: A Social Semiotic Analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines how drone videography constructs visual meaning in government public communication through a social semiotic perspective. While drone technology has become increasingly prevalent in governmental media production, existing studies have largely emphasized its technical and aesthetic advantages rather than its role in generating communicative meaning. Addressing this gap, the study analyzes drone videography featured in the Presidential Secretariat's official YouTube channel using the visual social semiotic framework developed by Kress and van Leeuwen. A qualitative approach was employed by examining visual data through three metafunctions namely representational meaning, interactive meaning, and compositional meaning. The analysis focuses on how aerial camera movements, framing, viewing angles, distance, salience, and information value collectively construct relationships between political actors, national space, and audiences. The findings indicate that representational meanings portray the President as an active national leader while simultaneously depicting Indonesia's territorial landscape, infrastructure development, cultural diversity, and strategic national events. Interactive meanings are established through elevated viewing angles, long shots, and dynamic aerial movements that position viewers as observers of state achievements while fostering credibility, authority, and national pride. Compositional meanings are created through the integration of visual salience, spatial organization, and cinematic sequencing, producing coherent narratives that reinforce government legitimacy and national identity.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Agustina, I. R. (2023). Implementasi Open Government Indonesia melalui Saluran Youtube Resmi Sekretariat Presiden. Jurnal Komunikasi Profesional, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.25139/jkp.v7i1.5674
Alkateeb, H. A. (2023). The British Council’s role in nourishing the English language teaching industry in the Gulf Cooperation Council region: a visual social semiotic perspective. Social Semiotics, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1833686
Berger, J. B., Hertzum, M., & Schreiber, T. (2016). Does local government staff perceive digital communication with citizens as improved service? Government Information Quarterly, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.003
Bertotti, V. (2024). Choice, marketing and subjectivities: A discursive-semiotic analysis of six Montessori websites. Discourse Studies, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241242924
Bonatti, R., Wang, W., Ho, C., Ahuja, A., Gschwindt, M., Camci, E., Kayacan, E., Choudhury, S., & Scherer, S. (2020). Autonomous aerial cinematography in unstructured environments with learned artistic decision-making. Journal of Field Robotics, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21931
Charolin, N., & Wedhasmara, A. (2024). Evaluation of community engagement on government youtube: Duration, title, dialogue, content, emotion. Journal of Business and Information Systems (e-ISSN: 2685-2543), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v6i1.234
Chatfield, A. T., & Brajawidagda, U. (2013). Political will and strategic use of youtube to advancing government transparency: An analysis of jakarta government-generated youtube videos. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8074 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_3
Ejaz, N., & Choudhury, S. (2024). Computer vision in drone imagery for infrastructure management. In Automation in Construction (Vol. 163). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105418
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fajri, C., Najih, M., Longani, K. D., Novianto, F., & Kusuma, A. (2024). Government Digital Communication Model in Corporate Social Responsibility Programs (Study in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta-Indonesia). Komunikator, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.23765
Fongesta, B. P., & Aulia, S. (2023). Analisis Semiotika Iklan Pariwisata Labuan Bajo. Kiwari, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24912/ki.v2i1.23067
Ghazvineh, A. (2024). An inter-semiotic analysis of ideational meaning in text-prompted AI-generated images. Language and Semiotic Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0030
Goundar, P. R. (2025). Researcher Positionality: Ways to Include it in a Qualitative Research Design. International Journal of Qualitative Methods , 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251321251
Hermanus, D. R., Suhono Harso Supangkat, & Fadhil Hidayat. (2023). Web-Based Anomaly Detection for Smart Urban Living: Drone Photography and Videography. Jurnal Sistem Cerdas, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37396/jsc.v6i2.330
Hofmann, S., Räckers, M., Beverungen, D., & Becker, J. (2013). Old blunders in new media? How local governments communicate with citizens in online social networks. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.421
Hubert, R. B., Estevez, E., Maguitman, A., & Janowski, T. (2020). Analyzing and Visualizing Government-Citizen Interactions on Twitter to Support Public Policy-making. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3360001
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. In American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (Vol. 84, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120
Kencana, W. H., Situmeang, I. V. O., Meisyanti, M., Rahmawati, K. J., Nugroho, H. S., & Lubis, A. Y. (2023). Digital Communication Transformation in Sukabumi City Government. Komunikator, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.17206
Kodir, A., Tanjung, A., Astina, I. K., Nurwan, M. A., Nusantara, A. G., & Ahmad, R. (2020). The dinamics of access on tourism development in Labuan Bajo, Indonesia. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites , 29(2). https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.29222-497
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading Images. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Laenens, W., Van den Broeck, W., & Mariën, I. (2018). Channel choice determinants of (Digital) government communication: A case study of spatial planning in flanders. Media and Communication, 6(4Theoretical Reflections and Case Studies). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1652
Laghari, A. A., Jumani, A. K., Laghari, R. A., & Nawaz, H. (2023). Unmanned aerial vehicles: A review. In Cognitive Robotics (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2022.12.004
Li, W., Xiao, L., Yao, S., Hou, C., Wen, Z., & Ren, D. (2025). ED-YOLO: an object detection algorithm for drone imagery focusing on edge information and small object features. Multimedia Systems, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-025-01783-9
Livberber, T., Ayvaz, S., & Yalman, A. (2024). Perspectives on drone journalism in Turkiye: Journalists’ views on the use of drones. Heliyon, 10(21). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39790
Montes-Romero, Á., Torres-González, A., Capitán, J., Montagnuolo, M., Metta, S., Negro, F., Messina, A., & Ollero, A. (2020). Director tools for autonomous media production with a team of drones. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041494
O’Hagan, L. A., & Serafinelli, E. (2022). Transhistoricizing the Drone: A Comparative Visual Social Semiotic Analysis of Pigeon and Domestic Drone Photography. Photography and Culture, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2022.2116899
Passalis, N., & Tefas, A. (2020). Continuous drone control using deep reinforcement learning for frontal view person shooting. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04330-6
Pathak, K. (2024). Global trends and status of drone journalism: a systematic analysis of research constituents and key themes. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-09-2023-0323
Pinem, C. D., & Zarkasi, I. R. (2025). Metafungsi Videografi Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Pada Konten Komunikasi Publik Pemerintah. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v24i1.4651
Ramirez, F., Mari, W., & Martingayle, D. (2025). Let Us Fly Our Drones: An Examination of Student Newspapers’ Coverage of Drone Journalism. Journalism Practice, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2218332
Sáez Martín, A., Haro de Rosario, A., & Caba Pérez, M. D. C. (2015). Using Twitter for Dialogic Communication: Local Government Strategies in the European Union. Local Government Studies, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.991866
Sanders, K., Crespo, M. J. C., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2011). Communicating governments: A three-country comparison of how governments communicate with citizens. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211418225
Soysal, Y., & Türkmen, S. (2024). Reinterpreting the Member Checking Validation Strategy in Qualitative Research Through the Hermeneutics Lens. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.19
Stratton, S. J. (2024). Purposeful Sampling: Advantages and Pitfalls. In Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (Vol. 39, Number 2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000281
Suardi, S., Rahmat, A., Setiawan, W., Pawara, M. U., Alamsyah, A., Nugraha Arifuddin, A. M., & Hidayat, T. (2023). Design a Phinisi-Type Tourist Ship to Increase Tourist Interest in Vacationing at Taka Bonerate National Park. International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v8i2.16616
Tilаk, G. (2020). Drones and media industrу. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2020-25-2-360-366
Vujičić, M. D., Kennell, J., Stankov, U., Gretzel, U., Vasiljević, Đ. A., & Morrison, A. M. (2022). Keeping up with the drones! Techno-social dimensions of tourist drone videography. Technology in Society, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101838
Wang, B. H., Wang, D. B., Ali, Z. A., Ting Ting, B., & Wang, H. (2019). An overview of various kinds of wind effects on unmanned aerial vehicle. Measurement and Control (United Kingdom), 52(7–8). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294019847688