Reviewer Guide for Help: Journal of Community Service (HJCS)

Thank you for agreeing to serve as a reviewer for Help: Journal of Community Service (HJCS). Your expertise and insights are invaluable in maintaining the quality and integrity of our publication. This guide is designed to provide you with information on the review process and expectations.

1. Review Process:

- Upon receiving an invitation to review a manuscript, please respond promptly to indicate your availability.
- Reviews are conducted through a double-blind peer review process to ensure anonymity for both authors and reviewers.
- Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback on the manuscript's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
- Reviews should be completed within the designated timeframe to facilitate timely decision-making by the editorial team.

2. Reviewer Responsibilities:

- Evaluate the manuscript's originality, significance, methodology, and clarity of presentation.
- Assess the relevance of the research to the field of community service and its potential contribution to knowledge and practice.
- Provide specific comments on the manuscript's strengths and weaknesses, including suggestions for improvement.
- Consider ethical considerations, such as the accuracy of citations, proper attribution of sources, and adherence to ethical guidelines.
- Maintain confidentiality by refraining from discussing the manuscript with others or disclosing information about the review process.

3. Review Criteria:

- Originality: Assess the novelty and uniqueness of the research question, methodology, and findings.
- Significance: Evaluate the importance and relevance of the research to the field of community service and its potential impact on theory, policy, or practice.
- Methodology: Critically evaluate the appropriateness and rigor of the research design, data collection methods, analysis techniques, and interpretation of results.
- Clarity of Presentation: Evaluate the clarity, coherence, and organization of the manuscript, including the writing style, structure, and use of language.

4. Reviewer Report:

- Provide a detailed review report that includes an overall assessment of the manuscript, specific comments on each section, and recommendations for revision or acceptance.
- Clearly distinguish between major and minor issues, providing specific suggestions for improvement where necessary.
- Offer constructive feedback that helps the authors enhance the quality and impact of their work.
- Avoid making ad hominem attacks or derogatory remarks in your review, maintaining a professional and respectful tone at all times.

Thank you for your commitment to maintaining the high standards of Help: Journal of Community Service. Your contributions play a crucial role in advancing scholarship and practice in the field of community service.

Warm regards,

Ahmad Salman Farid, M.Sos.
Editorial Team
Help: Journal of Community Service (HJCS)