The Practice Of Programme-Based Budgeting: A Case Study Of A Mosque In Surabaya
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article delves into the budget planning process at the Ar-Rahmah Mosque in Surabaya, employing a qualitative case study approach. Data was gathered through interviews with key mosque administrators, including the director, treasurer, and department heads. The findings reveal that the Ar-Rahmah Mosque adopts a bottom-up, program-based budgeting method. This process encompasses the preparation and ratification stages of the budget, with careful consideration of revenue and expense forecasting, as well as budget approval. The study highlights that this approach facilitates a more inclusive and participatory budgeting process, ensuring that the financial plan aligns closely with the mosque's various programs and activities. The implications of this research are particularly significant for other mosques and nonprofit organizations looking to enhance their budget planning strategies. By adopting a program-based budgeting approach, these organizations can potentially achieve greater financial efficiency and transparency. This case study of the Ar-Rahmah Mosque provides a valuable model for effective budget planning that can be emulated by similar institutions aiming to improve their financial management practices.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Alhasnawi, M. Y., Mohd Said, R., Mat Daud, Z., & Muhammad, H. (2023). Enhancing managerial performance through budget participation: Insights from a two-stage A PLS-SEM and artificial neural network approach (ANN). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100161
Ali, M. M., Imran, M., Hamza, M., Jehanzeb, M., Habib, S., & Sajid, M. (2019). Industrial Financial Forecasting using Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100410
Alsaawi, A. (2014). A Critical Review of Qualitative Interviews. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2819536
Altenburger, M. (2021). Mood and honesty in budget reporting. Management Accounting Research, 50, 100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2020.100707
Auerbach, A. J. (1999). On the Performance and Use of Government Revenue Forecasts. National Tax Journal, 52(4), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1086/ntj41789430
Boukari, M., & Veiga, F. J. (2018). Disentangling political and institutional determinants of budget forecast errors: A comparative approach. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(4), 1030–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2018.03.002
Bt Shaharuddin, S., & Bt Sulaiman, M. (2015). Financial Disclosure and Budgetary Practices of Religious Organization: A Study of Qaryah Mosques in Kuala Terengganu. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 17(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.6151
Cho, H.-T., & Yang, J.-S. (2018). How perceptions of organizational politics influence self-determined motivation: The mediating role of work mood. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.05.003
Covaleski, M., Evans, J. H., Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2006). Budgeting Research: Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration (pp. 587–624). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(06)02006-2
Duan, W., Li, H., Sun, J., & Yang, G. (2022). Standardization of the strategy translation process, procedural fairness in budgeting and firm performance. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(3), 100254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100254
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Heinle, M. S., Ross, N., & Saouma, R. E. (2014). A Theory of Participative Budgeting. The Accounting Review, 89(3), 1025–1050. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50686
Jayasinghe, K., & Soobaroyen, T. (2009). Religious “spirit” and peoples’ perceptions of accountability in Hindu and Buddhist religious organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(7), 997–1028. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910987358
Jung, S.-M. (2022). Participatory budgeting and government efficiency: evidence from municipal governments in South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852321991208
Lau, C. M., & Lim, E. W. (2002). The effects of procedural justice and evaluative styles on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. Advances in Accounting, 19, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(02)19008-0
Mah’d, O. (2020). Bottom-up rather than top-down: evidence from Middle Eastern and North African educational institutions. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(4), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2020-0008
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. 408.
Mohamed Azam, M. A. (2013). Financial Management Practices of Mosques in Malaysia. Global Journal Al Thaqafah, 3(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT302013.03.01
Oranga, J., & Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative Research: Essence, Types and Advantages. OALib, 10(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001
Parker, R. J., & Kyj, L. (2006). Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.07.005
Pestana, M. H., Parreira, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Motivations, emotions and satisfaction: The keys to a tourism destination choice. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 16, 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.12.006
Prowle, M. (2014). The Role of Budgeting Systems in Supporting Strategic Management in the Public Sector. In Developments in Strategic and Public Management (pp. 21–40). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336972_2
Raco, J. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif: jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mfzuj
Sandalgaard, N., & Nikolaj Bukh, P. (2014). Beyond Budgeting and change: a case study. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2012-0032
Shields, J. F., & Shields, M. D. (1998). Antecedents of participative budgeting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00014-7
Strauß, E., & Zecher, C. (2013). Management control systems: a review. Journal of Management Control, 23(4), 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-012-0158-7
Strydom, B., & Stephen, T. (2014). Financial Management in Non-Profit Organisations: An Exploratory Study. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n15p55
Tsofa, B., Musotsi, P., Kagwanja, N., Waithaka, D., Molyneux, S., Barasa, E., Maina, T., & Chuma, J. (2021). Examining health sector application and utility of program‐based budgeting: County level experiences in Kenya. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 36(5), 1521–1532. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3174
Wan Hamdan, W. S. Z., Mohd Hashim, M. H., Mohd Radzuan, N. A., Hassin, M. A., & Ismail, R. A. (2023). THE IMPORTANCE MAINTENANCE BUDGETING FOR THE MOSQUES MANAGEMENT IN MALAYSIA: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management, 8(34), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.35631/JTHEM.834006
West, D., & Prendergast, G. P. (2009). Advertising and promotions budgeting and the role of risk. European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12), 1457–1476. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910989984
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. In 5. Sage Publications Beverly Hills London.
Zietlow, J., Hankin, J. A., Seidner, A., & O’Brien, T. (2018). Financial Management for Nonprofit Organizations. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119419242