Marketing Resilience Capability for Sustainable Customer Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62569/iijb.v3i3.297Keywords:
Marketing Resilience Capability, Sustainable Customer Relationships, Dynamic Capability, Relationship Marketing, Qualitative Study, Thematic AnalysisAbstract
Increasing environmental uncertainty, rapidly changing customer expectations, technological disruption, and intensified competition have challenged organizations to sustain long-term customer relationships using conventional marketing approaches. This study aims to conceptualize Marketing Resilience Capability (MRC) as a higher-order organizational capability that enables firms to anticipate, adapt to, and recover from market disruptions while preserving sustainable customer relationships. A qualitative multiple-case study design was employed involving organizations operating in the retail, service, and digital business sectors recognized for maintaining stable customer relationships during periods of market uncertainty. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with senior marketing managers and customer relationship executives, complemented by organizational documents, customer communication materials, and field observations. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis supported by the constant comparative method. The findings identify four interrelated dimensions of Marketing Resilience Capability namely adaptive market sensing, relational responsiveness, customer value reconfiguration, and relationship continuity management. Adaptive market sensing enables organizations to detect emerging market changes proactively; relational responsiveness strengthens customer trust through transparent and empathetic communication; customer value reconfiguration continuously aligns organizational offerings with evolving customer expectations; and relationship continuity management institutionalizes sustained customer engagement beyond transactional exchanges. Collectively, these capabilities enable organizations to maintain customer confidence, loyalty, and relationship continuity despite dynamic market conditions. The study further demonstrates that sustainable customer relationships are achieved not solely through superior products or operational excellence but through continuous organizational adaptation and relational capability development.
Downloads
References
Ahmić, A., & Ćosić, M. (2025). Digital human resource management influence on the organizational resilience. Organization Management Journal , 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-09-2024-2299
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cloutier, C. (2024). Strategies for Generating Deliberately Emergent Qualitative Research Designs. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863241235417
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Gündüzyeli, B. (2025). Cyber Resilience in Digital Marketing Within the Framework of Sustainable Management. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 17, Number 5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052080
Hasanah, Y. N., Anggraeni, O., Suwali, Kusnaman, D., Hasibuan, R. R., & Efendi, B. (2025). Entrepreneurial Marketing and Marketing Performance in Gen Z Entrepreneurs: Exploring the Mediating Pathways to Entrepreneurial Resilience. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6195
Hokmabadi, H., Rezvani, S. M. H. S., & de Matos, C. A. (2024). Business Resilience for Small and Medium Enterprises and Startups by Digital Transformation and the Role of Marketing Capabilities—A Systematic Review. In Systems (Vol. 12, Number 6). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12060220
Hunt, S. D., Arnett, D. B., & Madhavaram, S. (2006). The explanatory foundations of relationship marketing theory. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420610651296
Kang, W., Ratti, R. A., & Vespignani, J. (2020). Global commodity prices and global stock market volatility shocks: Effects across countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101249
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
Lages, L. F., Lancastre, A., & Lages, C. (2008). The B2B-RELPERF scale and scorecard: Bringing relationship marketing theory into business-to-business practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.008
Lewin, J. E., & Johnston, W. J. (1997). Relationship marketing theory in practice: A case study. Journal of Business Research, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00152-X
Lou, Y. C., Zhu, Q. Y., & Liang, C. J. (2025). Financial technology and firm operational resilience: The roles of supply chain resilience and marketing capability. International Review of Economics and Finance, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104744
Mandaci, P. E., Taşkin, F. D., & Ergün, Z. C. (2019). Adaptive market hypothesis. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/333
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017). The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z
Pfajfar, G., Mitręga, M., & Shoham, A. (2024). International dynamic marketing capabilities: developments and a research agenda. International Marketing Review, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2023-0283
Pitman, M. A. (1998). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1998.29.4.499
Stavros, C., & Westberg, K. (2009). Using triangulation and multiple case studies to advance relationship marketing theory. Qualitative Market Research, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750910963827
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tranová, K. L., & Veneti, A. (2024). The Use of Podcasting in Political Marketing: The Case of the Czech Republic. Journal of Political Marketing, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.2024479
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Yousaf, I., Hunjra, A. I., Alshater, M. M., Bouri, E., & Li, Y. (2023). Multidimensional connectedness among the volatility of global financial markets around the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102163
Zhang, Y., He, J., He, M., & Li, S. (2023). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility: A global perspective. Finance Research Letters, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103620
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mufti Fahrizal Harahap (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
